2 Timothy 2:23

Authorized King James Version

But foolish and unlearned questions avoid, knowing that they do gender strifes.

Word-by-Word Analysis

τὰς

G3588

the (sometimes to be supplied, at others omitted, in english idiom)

δὲ

G1161

But

but, and, etc

μωρὰς

G3474

foolish

dull or stupid (as if shut up), i.e., heedless, (morally) blockhead, (apparently) absurd

καὶ

G2532

and

and, also, even, so then, too, etc.; often used in connection (or composition) with other particles or small words

ἀπαιδεύτους

G521

unlearned

uninstructed, i.e., (figuratively) stupid

ζητήσεις

G2214

questions

a searching (properly, the act), i.e., a dispute or its theme

παραιτοῦ

G3868

avoid

to beg off, i.e., deprecate, decline, shun

εἰδὼς

G1492

knowing

used only in certain past tenses, the others being borrowed from the equivalent g3700 and g3708; properly, to see (literally or figuratively); by impl

ὅτι

G3754

that

demonstrative, that (sometimes redundant); causative, because

#10

γεννῶσιν

G1080

they do gender

to procreate (properly, of the father, but by extension of the mother); figuratively, to regenerate

#11

μάχας·

G3163

strifes

a battle, i.e., (figuratively) controversy

Analysis

The salvation theme here intersects with the metanarrative of redemption running from Genesis to Revelation. Biblical theology recognizes this as part of a unified storyline from the promise in Genesis 3:15 to its fulfillment in Christ. The phrase emphasizing divine revelation contributes to our systematic understanding of Christian doctrine and connects to the broader scriptural witness about God's saving work from the Exodus to the cross.

Historical Context

This passage must be understood within the political and social structures of the biblical period. The author writes to address believers seeking to understand God's will and purposes, making the emphasis on salvation particularly relevant. Historical documents from this period show cultural practices and social structures that would have been familiar to the original readers, illuminating the verse's original impact.

Questions for Reflection

What systematic theological implications arise from this verse's treatment of salvation, and how does it contribute to a biblical theology of soteriology and the doctrine of salvation?
How might the original audience's understanding of divine revelation differ from modern interpretations, and what bridges can be built between ancient meaning and contemporary application?
What practical applications emerge from understanding salvation as presented in this verse, particularly in light of addressing questions of religious pluralism and the exclusivity of Christ?